<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alexander the Tweet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/</link>
	<description>Twitter messages from the annals of time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:19:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haley</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Haley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the Medieval picture from the famous Medieval Romance of Alexander?

That was my first thought. Middle Ages writers tended to depict everything they wrote about as happening within their own time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the Medieval picture from the famous Medieval Romance of Alexander?</p>
<p>That was my first thought. Middle Ages writers tended to depict everything they wrote about as happening within their own time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Historical Tweets &#187; Historical Tweet of the Year</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Historical Tweets &#187; Historical Tweet of the Year</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>[...] There were a lot of good ones from the past 12 months, but one shone above and beyond as your favorite: Alexander the Tweet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There were a lot of good ones from the past 12 months, but one shone above and beyond as your favorite: Alexander the Tweet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeloresF</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>DeloresF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-661</guid>
		<description>All this really proves is that this site is owned by dumbshits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this really proves is that this site is owned by dumbshits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marky</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>marky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-650</guid>
		<description>&quot;Let’s all just hug.&quot;??!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Let’s all just hug.&#8221;??!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Harrop</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Harrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-639</guid>
		<description>twid erat constipandum would be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twid erat constipandum would be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-629</guid>
		<description>This is what happens on the internet. No one can actually hear what the other people are saying, so everyone reads it with their own interpretation.I&#039;m sure that, could we all talk to each other, we would be able to work out that it is a simple mistake that everyone should just deal with. The picture is wrong, I get it, but there is no need to get all angry about it. Personally I just don&#039;t care about it. The tweet is funny, but after you read the comments all I can think about is how angry everyone is, it really ruins the funny. Let&#039;s all just hug. Alright guys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what happens on the internet. No one can actually hear what the other people are saying, so everyone reads it with their own interpretation.I&#8217;m sure that, could we all talk to each other, we would be able to work out that it is a simple mistake that everyone should just deal with. The picture is wrong, I get it, but there is no need to get all angry about it. Personally I just don&#8217;t care about it. The tweet is funny, but after you read the comments all I can think about is how angry everyone is, it really ruins the funny. Let&#8217;s all just hug. Alright guys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin T</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-620</guid>
		<description>He is not complaining or upset about using anachronism! He just points out that the Middle Ages illustration doesn&#039;t fit Alexander the Great. God, you people are stupid. Just use a correct picture! He isn&#039;t complaining ABOUT anachronistic site, he complains about HOW the anachronism is done! You Thick as a Brick posters should lay off! By the way, “non compos mentis” doesn&#039;t fit the context as well the better and real “incompeteno mentis”. Sorry, it just really annoys me when people who Don&#039;t know what they think they do post their incorrect arguments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is not complaining or upset about using anachronism! He just points out that the Middle Ages illustration doesn&#8217;t fit Alexander the Great. God, you people are stupid. Just use a correct picture! He isn&#8217;t complaining ABOUT anachronistic site, he complains about HOW the anachronism is done! You Thick as a Brick posters should lay off! By the way, “non compos mentis” doesn&#8217;t fit the context as well the better and real “incompeteno mentis”. Sorry, it just really annoys me when people who Don&#8217;t know what they think they do post their incorrect arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadia</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-618</guid>
		<description>hahaha... i feel smarter just reading these postings...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha&#8230; i feel smarter just reading these postings&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander The Good</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander The Good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-615</guid>
		<description>Dudes, chillax! Or I&#039;ll make my next accomplishment beheading the lot of you and decorating my new hellenistic empire with your remains. srsly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dudes, chillax! Or I&#8217;ll make my next accomplishment beheading the lot of you and decorating my new hellenistic empire with your remains. srsly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-611</guid>
		<description>I think that this entire thing is ridiculous. Both sides are a bit correct, and definitely are both too defensive. If &quot;disgusted&quot; were to have said the the remark was &quot;incompetent&quot; he would be correct. Also, &quot;non compos mentis&quot; is correct in this context. It means not in control of your own mind. On a side note, what kind of person reads an obviously anachronistic website, and then complains that its anachronistic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this entire thing is ridiculous. Both sides are a bit correct, and definitely are both too defensive. If &#8220;disgusted&#8221; were to have said the the remark was &#8220;incompetent&#8221; he would be correct. Also, &#8220;non compos mentis&#8221; is correct in this context. It means not in control of your own mind. On a side note, what kind of person reads an obviously anachronistic website, and then complains that its anachronistic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin T</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-610</guid>
		<description>Gotta side with “disgusted”. Although, “non compos mentis” is a correct Latin phrase it is not the correct phrase for the context of his post. “hoity toity”? It&#039;s spelled with a dash and it&#039;s meaning does not really fit your remark...If I want to be snooty about it. “You&#039;re an idiot”?! You are rude and incorrect about “incompeteno mentis”! Lastly, I agreed with the point made by “disgusted”! I think you&#039;re just overly defensive about the knuckle-headed picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta side with “disgusted”. Although, “non compos mentis” is a correct Latin phrase it is not the correct phrase for the context of his post. “hoity toity”? It&#8217;s spelled with a dash and it&#8217;s meaning does not really fit your remark&#8230;If I want to be snooty about it. “You&#8217;re an idiot”?! You are rude and incorrect about “incompeteno mentis”! Lastly, I agreed with the point made by “disgusted”! I think you&#8217;re just overly defensive about the knuckle-headed picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That guy</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>That guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-608</guid>
		<description>I hate to be &quot;that guy&quot; but the phrase &quot;non compos mentis&quot; is absolutely correct, and &quot;incompeteno mentis&quot; isn&#039;t even an actual Latin phrase. You&#039;re an idiot, unless you are trying to evoke outrage for your own amusement. If that is the case, well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to be &#8220;that guy&#8221; but the phrase &#8220;non compos mentis&#8221; is absolutely correct, and &#8220;incompeteno mentis&#8221; isn&#8217;t even an actual Latin phrase. You&#8217;re an idiot, unless you are trying to evoke outrage for your own amusement. If that is the case, well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WEHO WILLY</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>WEHO WILLY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-549</guid>
		<description>RE: disgusted &amp; annoyed...well ain&#039;t we hoity toity ! Dissect and chew on those words for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: disgusted &amp; annoyed&#8230;well ain&#8217;t we hoity toity ! Dissect and chew on those words for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kzirk</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>Kzirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-528</guid>
		<description>i agree with with Twitter Historian!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with with Twitter Historian!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annoyed</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>annoyed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-499</guid>
		<description>Historical tweets are the premise for these parodies.
The anachronistic illustration is just incorrect and inept.


No. The phrase is not &quot;non compos mentis&quot;. Parer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historical tweets are the premise for these parodies.<br />
The anachronistic illustration is just incorrect and inept.</p>
<p>No. The phrase is not &#8220;non compos mentis&#8221;. Parer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-479</guid>
		<description>I believe the phrase is &quot;non compos mentis&quot;.  Touche!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the phrase is &#8220;non compos mentis&#8221;.  Touche!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Historian</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Historian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-439</guid>
		<description>@disgusted What&#039;s funny to us is when people get upset at historical inaccuracies on web site that claims people were Twittering in 344 BC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@disgusted What&#8217;s funny to us is when people get upset at historical inaccuracies on web site that claims people were Twittering in 344 BC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disgusted</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>disgusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-435</guid>
		<description>The illustration depicting the Middle Ages is just wrong and yet you enshrined the faux pas on your first gift?! Incompeteno mentus...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The illustration depicting the Middle Ages is just wrong and yet you enshrined the faux pas on your first gift?! Incompeteno mentus&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaye XD</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaye XD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Cute. That&#039;s good :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cute. That&#8217;s good :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Historical Tweets &#187; Alexander the Tweet Gifts</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Historical Tweets &#187; Alexander the Tweet Gifts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-137</guid>
		<description>[...] Order the first of our new Historical Tweets gifts, featuring Alexander the Tweet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Order the first of our new Historical Tweets gifts, featuring Alexander the Tweet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Richardson</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/01/26/alexander-the-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>John Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=489#comment-129</guid>
		<description>I think I saw this joke in The Far Side gallery 1. It&#039;s still good though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I saw this joke in The Far Side gallery 1. It&#8217;s still good though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

