<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Gutenberg Tweet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/</link>
	<description>Twitter messages from the annals of time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:19:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Historical Tweets You Might Have Missed &#124; Historical Tweets</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Historical Tweets You Might Have Missed &#124; Historical Tweets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>[...] The Gutenberg Tweet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Gutenberg Tweet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gutenberg@Twitter &#124; Leander Wattig</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Gutenberg@Twitter &#124; Leander Wattig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-909</guid>
		<description>[...] Historical Tweets, Hugo E. Martin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Historical Tweets, Hugo E. Martin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacob</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-891</link>
		<dc:creator>jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-891</guid>
		<description>@Helen kidd im sorry but i must point this out. ahem, NNNNNEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRDDDDDDDDDDDSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! just kidding. but you guys are still analysing this WAY to deeply. its just done for humor. acurate or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Helen kidd im sorry but i must point this out. ahem, NNNNNEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRDDDDDDDDDDDSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! just kidding. but you guys are still analysing this WAY to deeply. its just done for humor. acurate or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HistoryFaculty</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>HistoryFaculty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-890</guid>
		<description>Okay, settle down now.This is supposed to be FUNNY/SATIRICAL, kind of like a newspaper editorial cartoon. It&#039;s the idea of it -- that literacy was 2-3% or so and mostly just the &quot;elites&quot;, and that we all know with 20/20 hindsight that this printing press took off and was one of the great successes in history! So FUNNY, knowing as we do of the tremendous success of the printing press, to think of JG saying &quot;Oh crap, I spent all this time and effort on this thing, and it&#039;s going to be a big flop.&quot;  (FYI on requiring precise historical accuracy - it&#039;s a friggin&#039; TWEET for heaven&#039;s sake!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, settle down now.This is supposed to be FUNNY/SATIRICAL, kind of like a newspaper editorial cartoon. It&#8217;s the idea of it &#8212; that literacy was 2-3% or so and mostly just the &#8220;elites&#8221;, and that we all know with 20/20 hindsight that this printing press took off and was one of the great successes in history! So FUNNY, knowing as we do of the tremendous success of the printing press, to think of JG saying &#8220;Oh crap, I spent all this time and effort on this thing, and it&#8217;s going to be a big flop.&#8221;  (FYI on requiring precise historical accuracy &#8211; it&#8217;s a friggin&#8217; TWEET for heaven&#8217;s sake!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen  Kidd</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen  Kidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-864</guid>
		<description>@Karl Adultt You are absolutely correct. I was mistaken in my date on the press. The Bible completed printing on the press in 1455. I just gave a presentation on the history of Scripture translation and should have looked at both my notes and the powerpoint presentation instead of just the presentation. My apologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Karl Adultt You are absolutely correct. I was mistaken in my date on the press. The Bible completed printing on the press in 1455. I just gave a presentation on the history of Scripture translation and should have looked at both my notes and the powerpoint presentation instead of just the presentation. My apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Adultt</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Adultt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-863</guid>
		<description>@Helen Kidd:  You are, in fact, the one in error.  Historical record makes it clear that the press was invented prior to 1455.  Indeed, it was operational by 1450.  Perhaps you are confusing the date of the invention of the press with the date of the first book to be published using the press (the Bible in 1455).  It&#039;s an easy mistake to make, so please don&#039;t beat yourself up about it.  Just promise you&#039;ll go back to your history books -- none of the fine readers of this site ought to be led down the disastrous pathway of historical inaccuracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Helen Kidd:  You are, in fact, the one in error.  Historical record makes it clear that the press was invented prior to 1455.  Indeed, it was operational by 1450.  Perhaps you are confusing the date of the invention of the press with the date of the first book to be published using the press (the Bible in 1455).  It&#8217;s an easy mistake to make, so please don&#8217;t beat yourself up about it.  Just promise you&#8217;ll go back to your history books &#8212; none of the fine readers of this site ought to be led down the disastrous pathway of historical inaccuracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Historian</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Historian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-862</guid>
		<description>@Helen

You&#039;re right.  When it comes to accuracy in describing 15th-century people using a 21st-century technology, we should be ashamed of ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Helen</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right.  When it comes to accuracy in describing 15th-century people using a 21st-century technology, we should be ashamed of ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen  Kidd</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen  Kidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-861</guid>
		<description>Boy, how wrong you are. Why, do you think, he invented the press? By 1400, the Bible is in 28 different languages (all hand-written) and translators killed for doing so. In 1455 Gutenberg invents the printing press and the first thing printed is the Bible. In 1522 Martin Luther comes along and not only nails 95 theses to the front door of the Roman Catholic Church proclaiming salvation by faith alone, he gave the printing industry a profit margin. Printers wanted to feed their families and so they were willing to print whatever Luther was willing to give them in their native tongue of German while the Catholic church wanted to keep everything in Latin. Go back to your history books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, how wrong you are. Why, do you think, he invented the press? By 1400, the Bible is in 28 different languages (all hand-written) and translators killed for doing so. In 1455 Gutenberg invents the printing press and the first thing printed is the Bible. In 1522 Martin Luther comes along and not only nails 95 theses to the front door of the Roman Catholic Church proclaiming salvation by faith alone, he gave the printing industry a profit margin. Printers wanted to feed their families and so they were willing to print whatever Luther was willing to give them in their native tongue of German while the Catholic church wanted to keep everything in Latin. Go back to your history books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wer verbreitet Wissen in der Wissensgesellschaft des Internet? &#171; sozlog</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Wer verbreitet Wissen in der Wissensgesellschaft des Internet? &#171; sozlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-793</guid>
		<description>[...] Gutenberg Tweet, via Historical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gutenberg Tweet, via Historical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reuben Robert</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Reuben Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-550</guid>
		<description>man, his investors must&#039;ve been pissed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man, his investors must&#8217;ve been pissed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: björn &#124; AMHERD &#124; Historical Tweets</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>björn &#124; AMHERD &#124; Historical Tweets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-220</guid>
		<description>[...] wäre wenn&#8230; Gutenberg, Henry Ford oder Oscar Wilde zu ihrer Zeit einen Twitter-Account gehabt hätten? Historical Tweets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wäre wenn&#8230; Gutenberg, Henry Ford oder Oscar Wilde zu ihrer Zeit einen Twitter-Account gehabt hätten? Historical Tweets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Seems like Johannes could have used a little market research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like Johannes could have used a little market research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El humor 2.0 como recurso, también en orientación profesional (485) &#124; Yoriento</title>
		<link>http://historicaltweets.com/2009/03/02/the-gutenberg-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>El humor 2.0 como recurso, también en orientación profesional (485) &#124; Yoriento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicaltweets.com/?p=627#comment-196</guid>
		<description>[...] Os dejo la lista tras el leer el resto de la entrada. Me ha gustado mucho, por ejemplo, esta anotación de Gutenberg en Twitter que vi en Historical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Os dejo la lista tras el leer el resto de la entrada. Me ha gustado mucho, por ejemplo, esta anotación de Gutenberg en Twitter que vi en Historical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

